• Home
  • Archive
  • About

Robyn Thomas

  • Home
  • Archive
  • About

Eddie's Reflection — Project Decameron: l'Umana Commedia

Suppose you came to this blog post because you attended the performance about to be reflected in it. First, I want to say a great "THANK YOU!" to you for coming to the show, and second, "THANK YOU!" to you for stopping by this site. Realize you did so with questions like "Who's Eddie?" or others. If you couldn't make the show, you were not alone. Acouple of us planned to be there, but at the last minute, couldn't make it either. Whether you attended or not, here you'll find answers, and possibly a few more questions. If you have them, don't hesitate to ask!

Like all entries on this blog site, its purpose is as a space archive the documentation of the process forming the artwork, first and foremost for me, the artist, providing a record to refer back as I move forward on future versions of this or other projects. I mix the history of this project's development with background information and basic research on the performers, the ideas and content forming the piece, photos from various stages of its development, a video documenting the performance, post-performance personal reflection, and my thoughts for future iterations. This project is a collaboration with many artists, so this posting is by no means a definitive documentation as it provides merely one of many viewpoints, mine. Still, included near the end are words from another project artist, Enno Fritsch, who at the last minute was unable to attend. Enno, like those readers who may be encountering this project only through this posting, shares his response to this documentation, and his ideas and enthusiasm for future iterations of this project

Reading a process blog is like looking through a sketchbook or visiting the studio of an artist who has passed away; you will have a very different relationship to its contents than the artist. I recommend approaching it with the same mindset as the sketchbook or studio. Flip through or linger, and ask yourself questions — again, feel free to send them my way, too. Important to keep in mind, this blog is about process —a series of actions or events performed to make something— and not resolution, completion, or finality. Links have been embedded at various points, some of which are short videos that I use when I teach or find something in my research and that I would like to refer back to now and again. I recommend checking out the links, or bookmarking them to visit at a later time. Even if you do decide not to go down the rabbit hole like Alice at the moment, you might find some answers to questions, or at least Wonderland, when you do.

Project Decameron: l'Umana Commedia (George Angelvoski, Enno Fritsch, and Robyn Thomas) premiered in its first iteration as the opening performance piece of Eddie's in the Space-Time Continuo, with Renaissance Noise Restoration (Cilla Vee and Tom Law), Laurie Amat, and Kristina Warren at AS220 in the BLACK BOX performance space; 95 Empire Street, Providence, Rhode Island on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 from 7 to 10 PM. 

And now, to how the story began...


Invitation

During a Zoom conversation earlier this year, Claire Elizabeth Barratt shared with me plans she and Tom Law had for a 'Mostly August 2024' tour of the Northeastern US and Canada in which they would be combining their passion for Early Music, Noise Music/Sound Art, and Improvisation/Performance Art into the project 'Renaissance Noise Restoration.'Claire, better known by her artist moniker 'Cilla Vee,' is an international interdisciplinary artist, director of Cilla Vee Life Arts (a cross-disciplinary arts organization), creator of the Living Art performance pedagogy and practice method, and the founder and director of the Center for Connection and Collaboration in Asheville, North Carolina. I have enjoyed knowing and collaborating with Claire numerous times since we first met in Berlin, Germany, a decade ago. Tom is a composer and improviser from South Carolina, now based in Saugerties, New York. He performs laptop-based electroacoustic music with viola da gamba, solo, and in Duo Denum, Cheli-Law Duo, Elka Bong Big Band, and the New York City Early Music ensembles Nautilus Renaissance Viols and the https://continuony.org/. Their Project piqued my interest, and I am always willing to travel to see Cilla Vee perform or, even better, participate. I suggested contacting some places we had visited in Rhode Island in 2019 when planning a performance and workshop that morphed into two other projects (one online and one in Asheville at the CCC) after COVID-19 hit regarding space availability. In turn, she suggested that Enno Fritsch, with his muselar and access to pipe organs, and I, with some visual art, join the evening's program as another act to fill the bill. Despite a lack of the cold, white stuff, Winter 2024 had both Enno and I snowed under, but it was too tempting an offer to reject outright. Nevertheless, we both immediately replied in the affirmative, excited by the idea and the opportunity. We'd figure out the rest.

Renaissance and Baroque

As used in this Project, Renaissance refers to the transitional period in Northern European (i.e., Flemish, British Isles, German, and Scandinavian) culture between the Middle Ages and the Modern Era of the 15th and 16th centuries. Inspirational to our Project from this period are the concepts of layering, invention, rebirth, and change or transcendence found in the Renaissance through the method of learning called 'humanism.' Inspired by the ideas and culture of Ancient Greece and Rome, attaining perfection of mind and body is to become the 'universal man,' in which no single identity, form, deity, or substance dominates. Still, a balanced and harmonious whole is achieved through polyphony. For example, in the Renaissance polymaths, Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Leone Battista Alberti. These concepts are exemplified in Renaissance music with the emergence of polyphonic style, music as entertainment, and the increased education of amateurs with the emerging bourgeois.

The Baroque (ca. 1600 - ca. 1750) started with the ornamental elements introduced by the Renaissance —contrast, movement, exuberant detail, deep color, grandeur, and surprise — combined with new motifs to evoke awe. Eventually, 'evoking awe' grew to 'provoking' and shocking the senses. From there, the meaning of the word developed across the languages of Europe, "barroco" in Portuguese (1728), was defined as a "coarse and uneven pearl." The dictionary of the French Academy (1762) used the word to describe something "irregular, bizarre, or unequal." Likewise, in music, 'Baroque' was used in reviews to describe disapprovingly or attack music found to have an incoherent melody, unsparingly dissonant, that constantly changed the key and meter. Baroque meant something was just plain wacky. Still, the Baroque was a period of experimentation by artists and musicians who did not intend to be disrespectful but felt unconstrained by traditions. That openness allowed them to improvise, invent, and innovate new forms —for example, the concerto, the sinfonia, ballet, and opera— and the two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects that support and enrich them. Being wacky led to what we now understand as beautiful art.

George

Shortly after my conversation with Claire, I learned that another colleague, George Angelvoski, would be in NYC in early August. It might not seem strange, given that George is an artist, but he lives in his hometown of Melbourne, Australia. The last time we'd all been able to meet up in person was in March 2019. We had kept in touch throughout the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, on an almost weekly basis for the first months, online at the 'Café Decameron.'

Café Decameron

What was Café Decameron? In the tradition of an international artists café or Salon, I organized and hosted a weekly Zoom call during the lock-downs, which continued intermittently throughout 2021. When the pandemic began, I was writing a doctoral thesis with a university-provided account granting unlimited time on calls. I had already spent most of my days in my basement studio alone, and I was a regular worldwide online caller for many years. Still, the pandemic was different. My aim for Café D. was to gather people from various corners of the world who may or may not know each other and then to see what happens. 

The invitation was open to anyone who wanted to join, and the call began on Fridays at 20:00 (UTC -4 or -5, depending on Standard or Summer time). Instead of using only virtual backgrounds offered by Zoom, I set up backgrounds in my studio, dressed up, grabbed a beverage or snack, and encouraged participants to do the same. I would ask questions and suggest discussion topics, whatever seemed appropriate. Various people attended, some who knew each other well, others who knew each other slightly, some who never met before; eventually, we landed with a core group. Time zones were challenging; Europe and Africa were out mid-night, but North and South America and Asia/Australia worked: Friday evenings and Saturday brunch. 

George

Hearing George's name, a series of photographs he shared with us in the Café he was creating during the daily permitted exercise' lock-down runs' while still living in Singapore came to my mind along with the openness, passion, curiosity, and experimentation with which he approached creating art. George's artwork was lush, elaborate, and, indeed, baroque. His ability to create works that seek restoration and transcendence would fit perfectly with the muselar, the pipe organ, and the theme of Claire's and Tom's 'RNR' project. I could see a program and a project forming, so I reached out to George, who gladly accepted. In the meantime, Claire and Tom had secured a location, AS220, one of the venues we had visited five years earlier. 

AS220

AS220 is a treasure for Rhode Island artists and all residents and visitors to the state and artists worldwide. The organization is modest on its website when writing that "AS220 has earned a national reputation synonymous with an egalitarian, accessible approach to creative community;" its reputation is growing internationally. It is a model for a successful, artist-run organization committed to providing a non-juried and uncensored forum for the arts. AS220 allows artists to live, work, exhibit, and perform in facilities and services available to artists to create original work. When I first moved to Rhode Island over 20 years ago and learned about AS220, I was astounded at what it did then, growing four-fold across the western edge of central Downcity as it restored three buildings. I am proud to live in a city with an organization like AS220 because, like the founders of this organization, I believe that freedom of expression is crucial for developing strong communities and individual spirits. I value the alternatives to conventional galleries, theaters, clubs, performance spaces, live-work, and private and public access studio spaces AS220 provides. Even if I do not personally use all of these, I benefit because the community benefits from having access to alternatives. Because all Rhode Island artists may share their original artwork at AS220, and AS220 embraces all the arts:  theater, dance, poetry, photography, music, printmaking, creative "hacking," painting, puppetry, and beyond, I am confident that Rhode Islanders will continue to improvise, invent, and innovate new forms, like in the Baroque.

In the past twenty years as a Rhode Island-based artist, I have exhibited in an AS220 gallery, taken very affordable workshops and classes, attended exhibitions of friends and of artists I have never met but whose art I have grown to admire; I have attended performances of local, regional, national and international performers, and now I have also performed at AS220. I support this non-profit community arts organization however I can because they support not just me and my art but anyone who wants to make art, no matter who they are or what they do, enabling new art forms to emerge. I encourage others to support AS220 so that they continue fostering the freedom of expression and creative community here in Rhode Island and beyond. 

Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia

With George, Enno, and I collaborating, the Project's visual and musical core began to take shape. What was it called? What was its story? Did it have a story in the sense of a traditional "Once upon a time…" narrative? What musical compositions and artworks would be included? Moreover, what would my role be because I did not plan to include visual artworks of my own making, and I am not a musician or performer? 

The role I slipped into was similar to the one I played in Café Decameron: part sounding board, part channel, organizing and communicating to pull out the ideas of the others while driving the Project forward. Enno, George, Claire from the 'RNR,' and I were all part of Café Decameron. The spirit of it was alive in this Project from the start, so the name 'Project Decameron' seemed appropriate. Further, I suggested the extension of the title to include the 'human' comedy or, in Italian, l'Umana Commedia, the nickname given to The Decameron by its author Giovanni Boccaccio (1313 - 1375), playfully in opposition to Dante Alighieri's 'Divine' Comedy. The human comedy, being human —life, death, change, rebirth, transcendence— that is what this Project is all about. 

It has structure, but it is not a narrative per se; our story does not begin "Once upon a time…"; it is hundreds of overlapping, intersecting stories layered upon each other. Boccaccio's The Decameron, from which I took the Café's name, is a 'frame story,' a collection of short stories; 100 short stories told by a group of young women and men as they sought shelter from the bubonic plague pandemic (1346 -1353) in a villa outside Florence for about ten days in 1348, much like we were doing online in the Spring and Summer of 2020. Ours is also a 'frame story,' consisting of three stories of projected pictures and recorded sounds sandwiched between the clanging of medieval church bells. 

Curiosity and Experimentation

Just as the Baroque built upon elements of the Renaissance, and the Renaissance was constructed out of ideas from the Ancient Greeks and Romans, Boccaccio borrowed most of the stories he included in The Decameron from earlier cultures and languages. Of course, I took Café D. as an homage to the situation we found ourselves in during Spring 2020; Boccaccio's stories are not new, but how they are framed and told is. 

There is nothing new here or there, then or now, which is okay when there is openness and a willingness to go outside existing comfort zones to discover new relationships.

An eager wish to know or learn about the past by studying and questioning what already existed, then combining this information with the drive to experiment with newly improvised and invented forms, led to literary innovation in Boccaccio's tale; that's the author's curiosity at work. Curiosity is not driven by necessity but by the desire to gain knowledge, be challenged, experience something new or different, and enlarge one's viewpoint; without curiosity and experimentation, learning is hampered. So is creativity and art.

Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia

George and I, and then Enno and I, each separately, talked about what they considered including in the Project as pictures and music from their portfolios. I began thinking of how the pictures and music might work together in a performance. I gave my thoughts based on their selections and what I knew from what they had done previously. I made suggestions based on what they could do with what they suggested that they might not have considered. By late May, I had put together notes based on conversations and emails with each of them. By July 5, I had a draft order of the performance. So after, Enno and I flew with our younger son Lukas, who planned to play violin in the Project, to Germany, set to return five days before the performance. George flew to San Francisco from Australia a few days later to research another project before heading to New York City; he would arrive in Providence mid-day the day we were scheduled to perform.

Draft Plan and Order of Performance Notes, July 5 


~7:30 PM Program begins with the playing of the recording of the bells of the Collegiate Church of Saints Blaise and John the Baptist —Braunschweiger Dom— (1173) in Braunschweig, Germany. 

The muselar is positioned centered in the space that appears in the photo of the Psychic Readings Room BLACK BOX 7/25/24 as a 'performance' area, with the white painted, brick wall with a green eye light hanging on it; the instrument is flat against the wall with the lid open — it needs to be against the wall to support the opened lid. If possible, the performance area is dark. No light is shining on the muselar, or the light is low with no spotlight. With the final bell's toll, the projected image of 'Diamond-Lashd Eyes' (2010) appears. The projection provides the only light source for the space.

~7:35 PM 'Diamond-Lashd Eyes' (2010) is projected, and the recording of J.S. Bach's 'Dorian Toccata' performed by Enno Fritsch (1996) on the Walcker Organ in the Church' Unsere Lieben Frau' in Karlsruhe, Germany(recording length 5:24). 

No performer is present in the space; the focus is on the visuals provided by the photograph, the instrument, and the sound of the Bach organ piece. The audience should be left to ponder these juxtapositions. Historical information will have been available to early arrivals, but it is also unnecessary to appreciate the work. The main point is that the experience gives rise to the audience's questioning of what they see and hear before them. When the recording ends, the projection ends, and the space is dark.

~7:38 PM 'What's Left of the Dream' (2020) abstract photographs and recordings of H. Praetorius' A solis ortus cardine' on the Rolf Organ, Johanniskirche, Karlsruhe, Germany (1996) (recording length 5:27), J.P. Sweelinck‘Malle Sijmen’ performed by Enno Fritsch on the Ahrend Organ, Stellichte.

Depending on what the projection surface and number or images, etc. will be, the set up of the space could be part of the performance, or it could be done by George, myself, or both. The ending of this segment may also require a breakdown or changeover for the final piece.

~ 7:48 PM 'Oral Repair' (2015) projections and a mix of the recording of 'Malle Sijmen' and live performance of 'Malle Sijmen' on the muselar with possible recorder, violin, other 'special guest's and their instruments, and audience members playing the prepared organ pipes to fill in/repair missing notes. The piece will be played twice. First, with Enno on muselar and recording, the second time with the other instruments and organ pipes to create a layering of sounds.

Depending on what the projection surface and number or images, etc. will be, the set up of the space could be part of the performance, or it could be done by George, myself, or both, or it may be the same as previous piece. The organ pipes may need to be brought into the space and placed more prominently.

~7:58 PM Program ends with the playing of the recording of the bells of the Collegiate Church of Saints Blaise and John the Baptist —Braunschweiger Dom— (1173) in Braunschweig, Germany, and the space goes dark as the bells toll out.

Space is cleared for the following performers.

Collaboration

A critical concern of Claire Barratt's creative practice, and one I concur with, is collaboration. A feature of the 'Mostly August 2024' tour for the 'RNR' Project is splitting the bill with local artists. When they secured the location at AS220, they inquired who might be interested in joining locally. Laurie Amat and Kristina Warren answered. Connecting with Laurie and Kristina through AS220 was delightful, another example of how this organization sustains creativity in our community by connecting people.

The Psychic Reading Room BLACK BOX

We were programmed into The Psychic Readings Room, a much smaller space on the second floor without a projector and a row of windows facing Empire Street, leading to questions concerning how our projections, and the Project as a whole, might function in the space. The other local artists expressed concerns about the size and acoustics in the space as well. But the other performance spaces were booked, and we were assured Psychic Readings was suitable. However, we did not end up performing in the Psychic Readings Room. Instead, about two weeks before the show, the venue was changed to BLACK BOX, a larger space with a projector on the ground floor, due to the cancellation of another performance. Very fortunate; Psychic Readings would have been a tight fit, and the projections would have been less impactful. Little did we know then how critical the projections' impact in the space would be to this iteration, much more than initially envisioned, thanks to another wave of COVID.

COVID 

It was only fitting that Lukas woke up sick and tested positive for COVID two days before we were scheduled to perform. After all, we had been traveling the previous week, albeit masked. Still, the irony of the Project's relationship to Café Decameron was not lost. Enno and I tested negative, and George was notified. There would be no violin or recorder. Fingers were crossed that no one else would develop symptoms and test positive. Then, on Tuesday morning, Enno woke up with a scratchy throat. Keeping as great of distances as possible, we continued moving forward as planned. Wednesday, he woke up and tested positive. Time for a new plan.

Collaboration

Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia is a collaboration. As is frequently found in life and art, in Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia, boundaries and definitions are simultaneously quite distinct and, at times, overlap and blur. Time may be drawn out and equally fleeting. It is a frame story containing hundreds of other stories its players tell.

Primarily, the artists collaborating on the creation of Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia are myself, Enno Fritsch, and George Angelvoski. Claire Elizabeth Barrat is also a collaborator through the impetus given by her invitation, our collaborations over the past decade, her participation in Café Decameron, and her presence on August 14, as we prepared and as a spectator. She has also provided critical post-performance insight, as well. Lukas Fritsch, who intended to play the violin, was present on research and recording expeditions in Stellichte, improvised to George's video loops, and generally discussed this Project with us; he is a collaborator on Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia. And, finally, essential for any artwork, the viewer, listener, audience, or spectator, whichever term you prefer, is also present in its creation as a collaborator.

The Essentials: object + artist + spectator + curiosity + experimentation + innovation + collaboration + openness + transcendence = ART

When I teach art classes to artists and non-artists alike, I talk about what it takes to make an artwork 'art' to learn to look at, listen to, 'sense,' and appreciate what is being sensed 'as art.' I show a diagram I created based on British-American Philosopher Richard Wollheim's (1923 -2003) ideas of how we experience and appreciate art from his 1983 lecture and its publication Painting as an Art (1984). 


It's a triangle —equilateral, isosceles, or scalene, does not matter. What is important are the three points; they stand in relationship to each other by creating a boundary for the field or space that forms between them. That space between is 'ART.' The top point is "the object," a painting or a sculpture. Still, it is better to call it "the work" because it can be ephemeral and non-objective, like a poem, dance performance, or musical score. In the lower left, that point is designated "the artist." The artist can also be called the creator, the interpreter, the performer, the composer, the writer, or the painter; you catch where I am going with this; whoever is on the left is more active in their relationship to the object or the work. The person on the lower left point actively makes the work happen. 


Directly across from the artist, in the lower right, is "the spectator," AKA the viewer, the listener, the reader, the audience. Compared to the person on the lower left, that person has a passive role in their relationship to the object or the work. Standing at the bottom of the triangle, looking up in awe at the object sitting up at the top point, regardless of which point we are on, we tend to point at it and say either quietly under our breath or loudly for all to hear, "Look! That's ART!" Yet, we are wrong. There is a whole field between us and it. The field is filled with what each point, in relationship to the other points, brings to it. The object or the work brings the formal qualities and characteristics actively given to it by the artists while making it. From both the artist and the spectator come curiosity, experimentation, innovation, collaboration, openness, and transcendence in their interaction with the object or work and with each other. These are the essentials from which ART is made, and that's ART.

Collaboration

The plan was to have a layered mix of recorded and live music and projections. The first story would be empty of live performers playing music but feature a recording from one of Enno's organ concerts. The second story would also be a recording but on a different organ. However, while that piece played through the sound system, Enno would attend to the muselar, attempting to tune or make slight repairs to the instrument, playing a few notes or segments of another piece, adding a slightly disruptive layer to the work. The final story begins with a recording of the piece Enno plays as he works on the muselar, but he plays it on an organ in the recording. Then he would perform it "live" on the muselar. Finally, it would be performed as a mixture of recorded and live music, joined by Lukas (violin) and Robyn (recorder) playing select notes. Lukas and Robyn had been struck from the program due to COVID as Lukas's positive test on Monday, and now, less than 12 hours before showtime, Enno was also out. After informing George of the recent development, I looked closely at what we had. I concluded that Enno's live musical collaborations would have to be recorded.

Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia

Another complicating factor was that AS220, like most organizations in the post-pandemic era, still faces staffing shortages. No one was able to let us into the BLACK BOX until 4 PM, which was cutting it close with four people setting up; now, there were only two of us, and we hadn't seen each other in five years or been in the space yet. We had to consider this other shift in the program, too. I made a new to-do list to include the additional considerations, namely the organ pipes. Then, I recorded Enno playing the muscular in our dining room. We went over where sound files were located on his computer. I discussed possible scenarios with him and messaged George. After gathering the materials, including the organ pipes, with the tubing and small wind case Enno had constructed. Unfortunately, it would prove too much to incorporate with just George and me handling the logistics. By 4 PM, George and I were in the BLACK BOX; by 5 PM, we were working with Mike, the fantastic AS220 AV tech, that evening, and at 7 PM, folks started to arrive.

Exposed and masked, Robyn Thomas (left) and George Angelovski (right), AS220, BLACK BOX, August 14, 2024, Providence, RI, USA.

Pre-show

For the half-hour between the doors opening and the start of the evening's performance, we planned to have information available on the Northern European Renaissance and Baroque pipe organs, keyboards, and the relationship to visual art, precisely how these instruments are pictured in paintings of that period. People may not know what a muselar is, but the chance they have seen one in a painting by Vermeer is likely. We also wanted to provide a short guide or written program for those audience members who might be interested (knowing not everyone is) in the performance. Finally, Enno planned to display the organ pipes he had modified, which would be played by audience members during the final piece. Although the performance differed from how it was mapped out in the paper, we left it out anyway for people to read and take. It contained pertinent information about the slide show, the projections, the instrument, the recordings, and the artists.

Pre-Show projection of the manuals of the Ahrend Organ in the Gutskapelle Stellichte, played by Lukas Fritsch, whose hand appears to emerge from the muselar.


Picturing the People, the Spaces, the Keyboards, Muselars, and Pipe Organs in the Northern European Renaissance and Baroque.

A Virginal is a smaller and simpler keyboard instrument of the harpsichord family. It was popular in Europe during the late Renaissance and early Baroque periods (16th and 17th centuries). 


Flemish Viginals emerged in the 17th century as two distinct instruments depending on which side of the front of the instrument the keyboard was positioned; those to the left were known as Spinets, and those to the right were known as muselars. 

Produced exclusively in Northern Europe, the muselar's strings are plucked close to their center points, causing the instrument to produce a round, fluty sound of unusual power.

The instrument's body is rectangular or polygonal, with one note per metal string running parallel to the length of the case. 

Virginals were initially constructed without legs, to be placed directly on the lap or tables when played; legs and stands were later additions to these instruments.

Nuns played them to accompany their hymns in convents and young women in the home. 


Muselars and harpsichords appear as subjects in paintings of the era, including many by Johannes Vermeer.


Another term for muselar is the Dutch word' clavecimbael.' The young woman pictured in 'Young Woman Seated at the Virginals' is thought to be Vermeer's younger daughter, Elizabeth, and the instrument the same as the one pictured in 'The Music Lesson.'  —Lloyd DeWitt, Assistant Curator, European Painting before 1900, Philadelphia Museum of Art.

TO MY CLAVIER

Thou faithful stringed array,

Echo my sighting soul!

Now fades the clouded day

To night, all sorrow's goal.

Found strings, obey my hand,

Help me my pain withstand-

But, no, leave me my pain,

My feelings; tender skein.

Disconsolate though I seem,

I love the sufferer's part;

When lonely tears out stream,

Still weeps a loving heart.

-Friedrich Wilhelm Zacharias (1726 - 77), Bad Frankenhausen, 1754.


The Gutskapelle St. Georg-Christophorus-Jodokus Stellichte, located in Walsrode, Lower Saxony, Germany, is a small, late Northern European Renaissance—Early Baroque chapel that was in private ownership by a single family until the 1970s. Its interior space appears frozen in 1610. 

The organ case and prospect (front-facing) pipes are by Andreas de Mare (before 1600) and Marten de Mare (1610). 
In 1986, German organ builder Jürgen Ahrend (1930 - 2024) newly constructed the instrument's mechanics using the materials and substance of the historical instrument.

The pipe organ is one of the oldest instruments in classical European music; its origins can be traced to 3rd-century BCE Greece. 

According to the website of the long-running, weekly American radio program 'Pipedreams,' organs work like a big box of whistles.

In place of whistles, pipes sit on a hollow wind chest filled with compressed air by a blower or bellows. 

Pipe organs are not only musical instruments and generators for artistic expression; they are feats of engineering. 

The bellows were previously powered by water pressure or human interaction; now, they are more commonly driven by an electric motor.

Organ pipes are made of wood or a mixture of tin and lead. 

Each pipe has been designed with an individual voice and produces a single pitch when selected from a keyboard or manual.

One of the most fascinating aspects of pipe organs is their versatility; every pipe organ is a unique instrument.

Sets of pipes are combined in ranks to form a standard tone or timbre relative to the instrument's tuning or temperament. 

They contain many different ranks, and the character of an individual instrument is defined by the variety of differing pitch, timbre, and volumes players call forth from it by employing the pipes separately or in combination via the use of controls called stops. 

The tuning of the Stellichte organ is in 'Meantone temperament,' as is the tuning of the copy of the 'Ruckers' muselar (built by Helmut Zorn, Karlsruhe, Germany, in 1996), the instrument at the center of Project Decameron: l'Umana Commedia's performance tonight.

'Sic Transit Gloria Mundi' is one of many Latin mottos connected with mortality and music found inscribed on ornately fashioned Virginals. Unlike the natural, unfinished cedar wood of the Rucker's copy, for this performance, luminous projections from three series of photographic artworks by George Angelovski are the visual accompaniment to the music. In English, this motto 'Thus passes the glory of the world' unites these enigmatic visual artworks — from the dark yet colorful abstract photographs of the series What's Left of the Dream (2020) stemming from the period of the COVID-19 lock-downs across the series of copperiness of the Polaroids alluding to an oral-aural Renaissance in Oral Repair (2015), and finally to the Baroque beauty, fashioned in haute couture of Diamond-Lashd Eyes (2010). The uncanny present beckons to reconsider their perception of order and chaos, abstract and figuration, as the eyes and mind linger inside the intensely evocative, vibrating spaces in the sublime and mysterious imagery of Angelovski's artwork. 

View more of George Angelovski's art by visiting his website: https://georgeangelovski.com.

Our program opens with Luca Gans's recording of one of the most meaningful sets of medieval church bells in Germany. The bells are from the Collegiate Church of Saints Blaise and John the Baptist (1173)—aka 'Braunschweiger Dom'—in Braunschweig (Brunswick), Lower Saxony. Eleven of the twelve bells are antique; the three oldest and largest were cast in 1502. https://youtu.be/h6LM7Ecv-PM?si=_hEGykqzhavPse6– 

From there, we find ourselves alone in the Black Box with muselar and Angelovski's 'Diamond-Lashd Eyes' (2010) in the 'Late Baroque' and a 1996 recording of Johann Sebastian Bach's 'Dorian Toccata' [BWV 538] performed by Enno Fritsch on the Walcker Organ in the Church' Unsere Lieben Frau' in Karlsruhe, Germany. 

Next, Enno Fritsch enters the Black Box and seeks to repair the muselar. At the same time, pictures from Anglevoski's series 'What's Left of the Dream' (2020) slowly manifest and dissolve before us as Fritsch's 1996 recording on the Rolf Organ in the Johanniskirche in Karlsruhe, Germany, of the Latin hymn 'A solis ortus cardine,' here composed by Hieronymous Praetorius (1560 - 1629), plays.

We segue into the final recorded organ piece, Jan Pieterzoon Sweelink's 'Malle Sijmen' recorded by Enno Fritsch in Stellichte on August 2, 2024, with a video loop of three pictures from George Angelovski's series' Oral Repair' (2015). Fritsch, joined by guests on other instruments, will perform 'Malle Sijmen' live on the partially repaired Muselar as the images loop into the mix. 

Audience members will also be invited to join in, playing along on the organ pipes adapted for this Project.

Our program concludes with a replaying of Luca Gans's recording of the bells of the Braunschweiger Dom.

Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia is an offshoot of Café Decameron, a weekly international artists café-Salon-Zoom organized and hosted by Robyn Thomas (Providence, Rhode Island) held weekly in Spring 2020 during the lock-downs in the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic and intermittently throughout 2021. As is frequently found in life and art, in Project Decameron: l'Umana commedia, boundaries and definitions are simultaneously quite distinct and, at times, overlap and blur. Time may be drawn out and equally fleeting. 

The pre-show images, this text, a video documenting tonight's performance, additional information on the content of this performance, the artists involved and their artwork, and follow-up events will be available within 14 days of this program at https://www.robynthomas-explorations.com/blog-2.

Enno Fritsch is interested in space, expressed architecturally and sonically. He is a Principal with LLB Architects, teaches at the Boston Architectural College, is a part-time church musician, and studied organ with Christophe Mantoux at the Conservatoire de Strasbourg. https://soundcloud.com/enno-fritsch

George Angelovski studied graphic design at Swinburne University of Technology (1999) before graduating with an MFA concentrating on photography from Transart Institute for Creative Research. https://georgeangelovski.com/

Robyn Thomas employs an interdisciplinary painting practice to research the perception of identity's multilayeredness and mutability through material and performative processes' resulting objects and actions. She has earned a Ph.D. (2022) and an MFA (2016) from the University of Plymouth (UK) and a BFA (1991) from Kent State University. While she teaches and enjoys opportunities to collaborate across various creative disciplines, she primarily paints and draws. https://art-robynthomas.com/

Lukas Fritsch is a rising sophomore at Classical High School in Providence, Rhode Island. He plays his great-great grandfather's violin (fiddle), which Erik Talley, a Providence-based luthier, and Lukas' violin teacher, fully restored in 2023. 

Documented 

Videos documenting the development and performance of the first iteration of Project Decameron: l’Umana Commedia.

Enno experiments with air mattress wind chest for organ pipes.

Positively irritating, post-COVID test video of Enno at muselar, dining room table. Wednesday morning, August 14, 2024. Preparing to record 'Malle Sijmen.'

Positively irritating, post-COVID test video of Enno at muselar, dining room table. Wednesday morning, August 14, 2024. Preparing to record 'Malle Sijmen.'

Live video of performance, AS220 BLACK BOX; Wednesday, August 14, 2024.

Photos documenting the development and performance of the first iteration of Project Decameron: l'Umana Commedia:

Projection test of Oral Repair (2015) George Angelovski on suspended paper in Robyn Thomas's studio, Providence, RI, June 2024.

Projection test of What's Left of the Dream (2020) George Angelovski, on 18 x 24 inches translucent white acrylic against cedar wood lid of the muselar located in Enno Fritsch's studio, Providence, RI, June 2024.

Projection set up for Diamond-Lashd Eyes (2010), George Angelovski, AS220 BLACK BOX.

Projection, Diamond-Lashd Eyes (2020), George Angelovski. AS220 BLACK BOX.

Oral Repair (2015) video loop, George Angelovski projection on muselar, photographed by George Angelovski AS220 BLACK BOX and posted on his Instagram @angelovskigeorge.


A Few Words From Enno:

I was bummed on Wednesday that I could not participate in the Project Decameron but was even more dismayed about it after I saw the video of the event. It seemed that the auditory and visual juxtapositions and overlays (of rather unrelated things) came together in suggestive and purposeful ways. Although the muslear was not actively played and the improvisations on the organ pipes (with violin and recorder) did not happen, the event not only contextualized Clair's and Tom's performance, but showed the potential of this concept. For me the highlights were the slow progressing projections of George's incredible photographs, juxtaposed with quick comic like tooth series with the background with the organ music, the acoustical overlay of the Sweelinck recordings on the 1610 organ and the muselar, and the overall activation of the space.

The exciting potential to me in this is to refine this concept with multiple projections in a non-directional room and supplemented with multi-directional sound systems interacting with/ overlaying live performance. Supplementing the photographic projections with one of Robyn's larger paintings would further increase the contrast between the presence of actual objects and sounds, overlaid with projections and recordings of things that are absent. This seems to be an appropriate multi-dimensional approach to further the theme of the absent past (renaissance/baroque) with our times with random, but suggestive relationships.

I am looking forward to collaborating on the next iteration.

Summation and Future Iterations


As I wrote at the beginning, this post has been a mixture of documentation, archives, and personal reflection on the process of the first iteration of the collaboration, Project Decameron: l’Umana Commedia. Along with serving as the place to hold the memory of this artwork's first manifestation, it is also the site to capture ideas for future iterations. Conversations between collaborators continue. The organ pipes and the layering of the live muselar performance with recorded organ recordings, other unknown artists, audiences, and spaces wait to join.

Wednesday 08.21.24
Posted by Robyn Thomas
 

Drawing at the Port Authority —RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding The Body

In November 2022, I was invited to The Center for Connection + Collaboration in Asheville, North Carolina, for a one-week residency. The residency ‘in-officially’ kicked off with the CCC-AVL’s annual Bonfire Night celebration on November 5. for the English, this date and the tradition of Bonfire Night is associated with the failed bombing of the House of Parliament in 1605 (AKA ‘The Gunpowder Plot’) and a fella named ‘Guy Fawkes’. At CCC-AVL, Bonfire Night is a community celebration of bonfires, music, and art performances. On that night, children in England go door-to-door collecting a penny for the guy; I collected the remnants of the bonfire, charcoal from the sticks and twigs gathered in the CCC-AVL’s garden, the raw material to make drawings. 

Because the charcoal was not intentionally produced for drawing, it was always hit or miss in terms of what it would do when it touched the surface. But its silvery-grey was softer and more transparent than most vine charcoals, and, with patience, it could be layered quite nicely. Still, it was slow to work with and dusty. I haven’t drawn with charcoal in decades, and my studio isn’t set up for it.

In early Summer, Claire Elizabeth Barratt, Founder and Director of the CCC-AVL and Cilla Vee Life Arts, a cross-disciplinary arts organization, announced Cilla Vee Life Arts would be collaborating with NYC area artists between mid-August and mid-September at the ChaShaMa Gallery space in the Port Authority of NY & NJ Bus Terminal, and invited me to stop by on Saturday, September 9 to draw. Claire and I collaborated on a presentation of our MFA thesis projects, incorporating ‘RAW MATERIAL’ too. We continue to collaborate on an online blog project, https://www.re-cultivatingcompassion.com, which featured the project at the Port Authority. Of course, I would be there; what would be better material to work with than the remnants of Bonfire Night. 

Only the thought of drawing with charcoal that could be so unpredictable in a space that was also equally unpredictable wasn’t very appealing. Previously, in the guise of one of my personas, Petra Nimm, and using watercolors, I had drawn Claire performing as Cilla Vee at X-Fest in Holyoke, MA. The fluid medium worked well to capture her movement and the environment. I decided to turn the charcoal into ink and draw with it.

Below are thirteen drawings I made that day on the second floor of the south building of the Port Authority of NY & NJ Bus Terminal. It was a wonderful experience to make the ink, watch what was happening in the space, draw, and talk with the people who stopped by to watch what was happening, ask questions, and share their thoughts. It was another way of experiencing art in NYC, in a space I have traveled through, stood in line, and waited frequently over the past 35 years. However, I have never considered it a space to make or engage with art.

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is the area of the installation ‘Earth Seen From Water.’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirits] Roses (MaryLinda, Sarah, Laura, Susannah).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirit] Tree (Gwen).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirit] Tree and Leaves (Gwen).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirit] Vine.’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Shio - Earth; Cilla Vee - Water .’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirit] (Gwen) .’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Water [Spirit] (Cilla Vee).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirits] Roses and Leaves.’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Earth [Spirits] (MaryLinda, Sarah, Gwen, Susannah).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Water [Spirits] (Cilla Vee, Marianne).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 23 cm x 31 cm (9 inches x 12 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Water [Spirit] (Marianne).’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 31 cm x 23 cm (12 inches x 9 inches).

RAW MATERIAL: Re-Wilding the Body. The subject of this drawing is ‘Water seen from Earth.’ Hand-mulled ink on Arches 300 g/m2 (140lb) hot pressed watercolor paper, 31 cm x 23 cm (12 inches x 9 inches).

Saturday 10.14.23
Posted by Robyn Thomas
 

OBSERVATIONS of the INFRA-ORDINARY

Since 2016 I have collaborated with Asheville, North Carolina-based, international interdisciplinary artist and founding director of Cilla Vee Life Arts and The Center for Connection + Collaboration, Cilla Vee (aka Claire Elizabeth Barratt), on various creative projects, including the web-based Re-Cultivating Compassion project. Recently, we have formed The Readymade Humans, instigators of group participatory performance data collecting happenings to explore and further cultivate compassion and awareness through actions and objects.  Our first piece, the installation-performance ‘How Long is a String?’, was created at THANGsgiving 2022:  Mashed-Potato Gravy-Reservoir Edition, ‘Paul Kafka-Gibbons’s semi-annual “Thangs” are day-long celebrations that bring together a wild array of artistic expressions [The Boston Globe]’at the Somerville Armory. Our second piece, OBSERVATIONS of the INFRA-ORDINARY, premiered at goodTHANGpassing 2023: Afikomen in Plain Sight Edition on April 7, 2023.

My collaborations with Cilla Vee provide another means of research and a form of sustenance that feeds my studio-based painting practice. I take the documentation of the actions (and reactions) of the performers (myself included) to the objects and ideas we are exploring together back to my studio, where I dissect them, reflecting on the experience and analyzing what I have collected in words and eventually paintings.

The following blog entry is my reflection and analysis of that day, accompanied by photos of the performance, the collected data —handwritten notes of the participant-performers of their observations—and the sketch of their words and colors, which ended the first phase of this piece at wireTHANG 2023: Peeps Edition , an evening event at Greg Kowalski's Wire Factory, in Lowell, MA.


"OBSERVATIONS of the INFRA-ORDINARY" is inspired by the following ideas. First, Marcel Duchamp's concept of the Infra-thin —the smallest interval of the slightest distance— was artfully described by Duchamp as "fire without smoke", "the warmth of a seat which has just been left", "velvet trousers their whistling sound is an infra-thin separation signaled"; the infra-thin is "The possible, implying the becoming —the passage from one to the other takes place in the infra-thin." Second, the extended essay An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris (1974) by Georges Perec and its expression of his concept of the Infra-Ordinary —what happens when nothing happens. This, Perec's written record of his three days of observing, illustrates how much happens when nothing happens. Third, the creative, individual and collaborative explorations of 'compassion' by The Readymade Humans —Cilla Vee and Robyn Thomas— for example, in their online project Re-cultivating Compassion.

Compassion is our inherent ability to 'feel with' others, which can be cultivated and strengthened through observation and exchange exercises with our fellow beings. These explorations result in an object, be it 'material' —a sketch, a drawing, a sculpture or installation— or 'immaterial' —a performance, a poem, a projection, music, video, sound or digital artwork— to be carried forth as vestiges of the compassion found in them. In this piece, created for a goodTHANGpassing —an extraordinary and infra-ordinary experience of the infra-thin— the observations of the participants become the objects from which other objects, and our understanding of compassion, may grow.

The premier performance of "OBSERVATIONS of the INFRA-ORDINARY" transpired in four parts. Parts I- II consisted of the exercises' instructions, delivered to the participants by a recording from Cilla Vee.

They followed them by collecting observations and leaving these as notes with Robyn at the end of Part II. Part III was the initial analysis by Robyn of the observation notes and consisted of sketching out the words and phrases of the participants onto a larger sheet of paper and augmented with watercolor during the remaining 1.5 - 2 hours of a goodTHANGpassing. Afterwards, while people packed up and cleaned up, the sketch was informally presented in front of the stage, then rolled up and taken by Robyn to the evening edition of a goodTHANGpassing, a wireTHANG, held that evening in Lowell, MA. Before the evening performances began, the sketch was informally presented by Robyn and Paul Kafka-Gibbons to the evening THANG attendees. That group mainly consisted of people who were not at the Somerville Armory and, therefore, were unfamiliar with the project performance, its participants, or the environment in the Somerville Armory earlier that day. The sketch became a diagrammatic bridge between the two events. Together, informal presentations of the sketch at the end of a  goodTHANGpassing and the beginning of wireTHANG were Part IV. 

The Readymade Humans have been invited back to the THANGsgiving 2023 edition to present what was revealed on April 7 and where this project led us between then and November 24, 2023. There might be a Part V (and VI, or more?).

The Numbers

In all, ten people participated as listeners and seers. Additionally, two other people declined to participate. Still, they remained seated with the group, observing without the sensory blocking devices or sharing their observations.


During this 20-25 minute performance, there were approximately five other people in the space, coming and going, packing up from earlier performances, and two dancers warming up in the upper-level space. Robyn, as the presenter, and Enno and Lukas Fritsch, who documented and assisted in setting up and distributing the sensory blocking devices, were also participating. Approximately 20 people were at least partially engaged in this performance in the main space of the Somerville Armory.

Meanwhile, the cafe on the ground floor near the Armory's main entrance was open. Customers and others with business elsewhere in the Armory possibly encountered the participants in the foyer and outside the Armory along Highland Avenue. Despite it being a day off school and at least three holidays, significant traffic was on the sidewalk and roadway. An unknown number of other people also encountered this performance, indirectly or passively, and participated in it as part of the observations of its participants. Later that evening, at a wireTHANG, another dozen people were present during the informal presentation of the sketch, bringing the total number of known persons engaged with this performance to 32, plus the others who remain uncountable. 

The Uncertainties of Parts III and IV

Beyond envisioning a long piece of paper marked with a black Sharpie marker, I was uncertain what would result during the third part of this performance. I packed a box of drawing tools, tape, a brush, and children's watercolor paints. Cilla Vee's idea to co-join the two parts of this THANG by way of this piece offered exciting possibilities, including offering the musicians present the use of the recording. However, I was unsure if I could attend, so I saved the .wav file to a thumb drive I gave Paul Kafka-Gibbons. He extended the offer to re-do the piece in Lowell, but after the long day, I was tired. In the end, I attended the first hour and a half, presented the sketch and explained the performance project. 


Other Observations and Recollections

  • One participant was hearing impaired and chose to be the 'seer' by simply turning off their hearing aids.

  • The recording of Cilla Vee worked very well. At first, a few participants thought she might be participating via a video call —a possibility we had considered in addition to a video call. 

  • The only 'technical glitch' was the ballpoint pens, which despite being from a newly opened packet, did not write! Note to ensure writing devices are in working order for future performances.

  • The locations chosen by the pairs varied. One pair remained in the seats they were in at the performances' beginning, another pair went outside to the front of the building, one pair stood just inside the door to the main space, one pair located themselves on the stage, and the fifth pair took the opportunity to visit the WC —not a location I had considered beforehand.

What’s next?

What became clear to me in the moment of the performance, as the participants collected, shared, and recorded their observations on the notepads, was that they were creating what would become 'readymades' available for future use. And I realized that during Part III, I could create a sketch, a schematic diagram of what was collected to serve as a bridge to the evening event and future work —paintings, poems, another performance— what exactly remains to be seen. Repeating this performance in another location with other participants would add to the list of readymade observations and allow for a deeper analysis of the differences and commonalities across the participant groups, environments and situations. This deeper analysis could provide a way to describe the relationship between the infra-thin, the infra-ordinary, and compassion as it is cultivated and strengthened through observation and exchange exercises resulting in creating objects and actions and more 'Readymade Humans'.


Transcription of Observation Notes —Capitalization, spelling and any punctuation are as they appear in the note.

Viewer

Light throug Window

Jumping on Stage

Cymbal Struck

Wide Open Space

Participants

Hearer

motor drones

fan motors for HVAC

refrigerator motor

moving air

muffled conversation

people moving around

door open

clinks & bangs (on reverse, not shown)

black tile

gray particle separation

white 

ceramic toilets w/no backing

ceramic washbasins 

(white)

3 urinals with 

blue heartshaped 

pads in drain

with holes

Jill standing and

listening

Footsteps

Wheels

Paper

Leaves

radio

car horn

All as they

came to perception

are after the

other to the ear.

Fan

Karen talking

peeing

flushing

washing

paper towel

bell sound from

outside room

blind person

changing position

architecture

purple ceiling

duct work

people sitting

black carpet

lint

detris

video screen

overhead lights

door frames

hum of Rur

creaking of Floor

Running

Something Dragged

Pushed

phone

talking

cowbell

vibration

smell of carpet

two people sitting

together without blindfold

crowd disperse

people recording us 

as if we were entertainment

Voices

Footsteps

FAR-OFF CONVERSATIONS

REFRIGERATION

CREAKY STAIRS

thick walls

tilted (sloped)

window sills

all empty except untilted

sill which collected

What were trees before?

protection

danger

suseptibility



Analysis of the Notes

Only one word appears exactly the same more than once, ‘Footsteps’, and it only appears twice.

Other words appear more than once in slightly different forms or context. These are as follows:

motor/motors (3)

white (2)

conversation/conversations (2)

ceramic (2)

window (2)

people (3)

door (2)

paper (2)

moving (2)

black (2)

talking (2)

sitting (2)

open (2).

Only one number is written as its zifer, ‘3’.

Various words wear used to describe the humans taking part in this performance

participants

person

people

crowd

words to describe their role in the performance

viewer

hearer

blind person

and the proper name of two of the participants

Jill

Karen.


Colors appear, mostly as neutrals —black (2), white (2) and gray—, but also a blue and a purple.

Gerunds were used frequently

moving

standing

listening

talking

peeing

flushing

washing

changing

sitting

creaking

running

recording

jumping.


There are words denoting perception, including perception,

smell

sound

vibration

hum

clinks & bangs.


And words that describe a characteristic

thick

tilted

untilted

(sloped)

heartshaped

creaking

creaky

as if we were entertainment.


or what is found in the ‘space’ —described as ‘wide open’— the ‘architecture’ 

window

stage

ceiling

duct work

overhead lights

door frames

floor (‘creaky’ and ‘creaking’)

stairs

walls

and window sills.


Of course, there were numerous nouns. 

Amongst which were

wheels

ear [the only actual body part mentioned]

radio

refrigerator

HVAC

leaves

car horn

detris [sic.]

phone

cowbell

carpet

cymbal

bell

tile

toilets

urinal

washbasin

drain

pads

holes

fan

papertowel

lint

blindfold

suseptibility

protection

perception

position

refrigeration

separation

conversations

voices.


‘Something’ was ‘dragged’ or ‘pushed’

  throug(h)

empty

outside

overhead

together

without

and

far-off.


The ‘carpet’ ‘smell’ed and the ‘crowd disperse’d.


But only one question: 

What were trees before?

Tuesday 04.18.23
Posted by Robyn Thomas
 

Seen, A Letter

Dear J—

On Saturday, I stopped by the Miguel Abreu Gallery on Eldridge Street to see the Paul Pagk exhibition you made me aware of on VernissageTV. Admittedly, I halfway listened to the video and did little research beyond looking at the paintings online. Still, I was intrigued to seek them out in person because of your question regarding what cannot be seen in the paintings in the video.

I continually ask this question myself and struggle with it as a painter who knows how much photographs and videos miss. It is incredibly frustrating because I know paintings are rarely seen in person as intended. Moreover, to be 'seen', the works must first be looked at (and judged) as digital reproductions, pixels on a screen and not paint on a surface. Curiously, NYFA offers a workshop on how to beat the algorithm that scans through (and discards) applications and get yours 'seen' by a human being —albeit that human is still looking at a digital representation of the work!

I spend a lot of time looking at reproductions and asking myself, what am I not seeing when I am looking? That question spurs me to put down the magazine, and the book, turn off the device and journey to see the artwork myself. And it is always a journey, always has been and always will be.

Journeys are never easy, but that is what art is —at least, for me—: a treacherous journey the work takes us on. It begins with me, the artist, conceiving and then making an object (or something), anything that demands to be physically experienced by countless others. These 'others' (spectators, viewers, consumers, or whatever you wish to call them), as they traverse that tricky pathway, continue making the object an artwork by experiencing it, in person, for themselves. This is why for the past 30+ years, I have journeyed inside the studio, making art, and outside it, seeing the art made by others worldwide, in reproductions and in person.

There is so much more for me to make and see, and as much as I hope to do so, the reality is that I will not make or see most of it. I make what I can and see what I can when I can, hopefully for as long as possible. This mindset has increased for me in the past decade, or perhaps I am only more conscious of it. Is it the result of middle age? Or it could be the disruptions to health or the pandemic when the world changed drastically, almost instantly (even if it slowly and partly changes back), that made me more committed to taking these journeys, not for where they will lead but for the sake of the journey itself. With hindsight, I know these are only part of what drives me onward. In fact, I have been ready to get up and go for a long time. This readiness has led me to where I am today — tired, with aching muscles, knee and hip reflecting not only on my most recent long day journey down to the City to 'see' art but on what I do and why I do it.

Getting to the point, what did I see as I stood before these paintings?

First, reaching them took me a while because I was distracted by the space. Despite its unifying neutral white walls and painted grey concrete floors, the expansive, post-industrial fourth floor of 88 Eldridge Street is not the late modernist cube for which these paintings appear to have been painted. Instead, the exhibition is broken up into four areas offering partial glimpses of each other. A long corridor containing four paintings well spaced-out along it leads from the reception desk, with bookstore shelves across from it, at the Eldridge Street end towards the expansive exhibition space at the back of the building fronting Allen Street. Two smaller galleries are to the left of the corridor; entering the first, I encountered thirteen small framed mixed-media drawing paintings on paper. I had not noticed them much when viewing the show online and was pleasantly surprised to discover them in person. The looseness of the shapes, the precision by which some of the lines were incised into and then appeared to float on top of the paper, and the juxtaposition of the fluid, chalky, and waxy-oily materials bumping into, sitting on, and sitting on top of, scrapped away from, and flowing beneath each other held my attention. These small works look messy and improvised, qualities I did not think I would find in this exhibition, glancing at the larger paintings online. Still, they gave me hope for the more significantly sized oil on linen paintings hanging on the other side of the wall and down the corridor.

Verily, to my eyes, the large paintings were not as cold and slick as they are on the computer screen. Nonetheless, I found them significantly less interesting than the works on paper. Pagk shows less exploration of the qualities of the materials he uses in these canvases; this weakens the juxtaposition of lines and shapes, which appear to be his interest. Oddly, their (almost) square format is also visually less enticing than the irregular, torn edges of the sheets of paper that could be standard rectangles torn from a notebook or block (but they are not). This might be one reason I found the paintings in the corridor or the second side gallery could not hold my attention. I returned to the small works on paper a few times before finally finding myself in the ample gallery at the back containing fifty per cent of the large canvases exhibited. Entering that space, I did not stop and navigate the colorful perimeter. Instead, I walked to windows at the back of the room and gazed down at the Saturday afternoon traffic of cars, shoppers, bicyclists, brunchers, and people burning off the stink of the week in the greenway of bustling Allen Street.

With the large oil paintings, Pagk is putting all his exploratory endevours into a single basket of color and composition and grasping it tightly. The canvases are rigid and dull, and it's time he let go of the basket and see how the eggs fall as he does in the works on paper. Looking at both again, I see what they share of Pagk's pursuits on the picture plane. But beyond materials and format, what else is at work in making one approach visually more interesting than the other?

Mulling over my experience of each, I find that 'what else' is the space in which each exists. Importantly, this is the context in which the viewer is asked to continue making these objects art. Although part of this exhibition hangs in a room similar to the one displaying the small works on paper, they are each contained in their own space —the picture frame. They float alone behind a sheet of glass in a neutral white box, isolated from the neutral, white, non-box-like gallery. I can focus on them individually, which I found challenging with the paintings hanging unframed on the walls of the oddly divided space. Yet, to clarify, placing a frame around the canvases would not have resolved my problems with the paintings.

Further, the gallery's space is not my only problem with these paintings. The second smaller space within the gallery containing four canvases and the two in the corridor shows that even in another less expansive and distracting space, they still would be dull. But of those spaces, I found the paintings occupying the smaller one and along the corridor less dull than those displayed in the vast open space with its wall of windows.

This may sound like an easy out, but had the exhibition ended before the large back gallery, had it just been the thirteen small framed works on paper and six canvases in the corridor and small gallery, it would have been a more exciting show. Sure, that would not have resolved the issue that the large canvases lack the qualities that make the works on paper much more enjoyable. Still, the ratio between interesting and dull would have been better, making the dullness less apparent. And there would have been no windows to draw me away from the work to gaze down onto the travelers of the messier, unrestrained, and exciting Allen Street.

Of course, none of what I just wrote about how I experienced the paintings of Paul Pagk could be determined by just looking at them on a screen; I had to make the journey to them so they could lead me on this written journey with them. But it does raise the question of the experience I described in this letter and the conclusion I came to by writing it add anything to the artwork as art?

Best, R—

31.I.23

Tuesday 01.31.23
Posted by Robyn Thomas
 

Powered by Squarespace.